Flexible compute
Identify batch inference, training, backup and tuning tasks that may pause, move or wait. Preserve service protection for online workloads.
Establish real workload flexibility before planning around energy supply, prices and eligibility. Business continuity comes first; market returns are not guaranteed.
AI concept · Not a project photograph or product specificationAssess only resources that meet operating, permission and market conditions.
Identify batch inference, training, backup and tuning tasks that may pause, move or wait. Preserve service protection for online workloads.
Assess onsite solar, storage and eligible procurement. Verify physical supply and environmental attributes; dispatch records alone do not establish zero-carbon operation.
Evaluate demand response, ancillary services and trading according to entity eligibility, response capability and local rules. Access to every product is not assumed.
Consider deadlines, data location, networks, site capacity and energy cost together. Include migration overhead and recovery costs.
Explain the workflow without disclosing internal algorithms, bidding strategies or client data.
Aggregate equipment, metering and task states. Check quality and assess demand, supply and flexibility.
Develop recommendations within business constraints. Define authority, validity and fallback, with accountable approval before execution.
Adjust permitted tasks through agreed interfaces. Verify actual power and service quality, stopping or reverting on exceptions.
Retain declarations, events, readings and acknowledgments. Allocate costs, assess deviations and reconcile under contracts and applicable rules.
Distinguish estimates, pilots and verified outcomes.
Compare total energy and maintenance costs at equal workload and quality, rather than a single interval's tariff.
Assess available windows, duration and execution deviations. Use measured response to support resource declarations.
Define dispatch uncertainty, performance charges, data permissions and exit terms. Investment and procurement require a complete project assessment.
Illustrative model, not live data, a DCP benchmark or a return promise. Compare power, grid energy and electricity cost at equal daily work.
Compute energy (unchanged)
480 kWh
Scheduled grid energy
1,788 kWh
Energy-charge difference
81.6 CNY
Grid peak (before → after)
125 → 114 kW
Swipe the chart or use the hour slider above to inspect values.
12:00 · Original 115 kW · Scheduled 103 kW · Solar 100 kW
Swipe the chart or use the hour slider above to inspect values.
12:00 · Original 15 kW · Scheduled 3 kW
Same tariffs and daily energy; grid energy charges only.
Solar consumed + grid imports = site demand. Surplus solar earns no revenue in this model.
Synthetic day, 1-hour steps. Fixed load: 95 kW at 08–17, 105 kW at 18–21, otherwise 70 kW. Original compute: 20 kW × 24 h. Movable work is ready at 00:00 and due by 24:00. Site limit: 160 kW. Assign 1 kWh increments by marginal grid cost. Illustrative tariffs: 0.4 at 00–06 and 23, 1.1 at 17–21, otherwise 0.7 CNY/kWh, not a regional tariff. Excludes migration overhead, demand charges, storage, depreciation, taxes, export revenue and emissions. Peak reduction is not the objective; grid peak may increase. Solar follows a synthetic sine curve.
| Hour | Original | Scheduled | Solar | Grid·before | Grid·after | Tariff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 1 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 2 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 3 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 5 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 6 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
| 7 | 90 | 78 | 26 | 64 | 52 | 0.7 |
| 8 | 115 | 103 | 50 | 65 | 53 | 0.7 |
| 9 | 115 | 103 | 71 | 44 | 32 | 0.7 |
| 10 | 115 | 103 | 87 | 28 | 16 | 0.7 |
| 11 | 115 | 103 | 97 | 18 | 6 | 0.7 |
| 12 | 115 | 103 | 100 | 15 | 3 | 0.7 |
| 13 | 115 | 103 | 97 | 18 | 6 | 0.7 |
| 14 | 115 | 103 | 87 | 28 | 16 | 0.7 |
| 15 | 115 | 103 | 71 | 44 | 32 | 0.7 |
| 16 | 115 | 103 | 50 | 65 | 53 | 0.7 |
| 17 | 115 | 103 | 26 | 89 | 77 | 1.1 |
| 18 | 125 | 113 | 0 | 125 | 113 | 1.1 |
| 19 | 125 | 113 | 0 | 125 | 113 | 1.1 |
| 20 | 125 | 113 | 0 | 125 | 113 | 1.1 |
| 21 | 125 | 113 | 0 | 125 | 113 | 1.1 |
| 22 | 90 | 78 | 0 | 90 | 78 | 0.7 |
| 23 | 90 | 114 | 0 | 90 | 114 | 0.4 |
Share task types, load curves and site conditions to establish coordination scope and validation methods.